Ian and Jess built Parker and Scott from $40,000 of personal savings to $40,000 per month in revenue at one Austin location. On camera, Founderpath funded $150,000 at a 12% effective interest rate over 5 years to open their second and third stores.
Current Revenue
Margins on Goods
Revenue from Refill Bar
Founders Initial Self-Funding
The full picture: who Ian and Jess are, what they run, what they asked for, and what Founderpath funded.
The business
Business
Parker and Scott (general store)
Founders
Ian and Jess (named after their two oldest sons)
Location
Austin, Texas (strip mall)
Storefront opened
3 years before recording
Category
Brick-and-mortar · Sustainable general store + refill bar
First $10,000 in sales
30 days after opening
First-year revenue
$95,000
Current monthly revenue
$40,000 ($480,000 annualized)
Refill bar share of revenue
15% ($6,000/month)
Margin on general goods
50% (50/50 split with consigned brands)
Margin on snacks
30–35%
Monthly lease
$3,700 (5-year lease, both founders signed)
Initial inventory
$40,000 of personal savings
Founder employment
Both still part-time at recording
The ask
Capital ask
$150,000
Use of funds
Open second and third Parker and Scott stores
Cost per new location
$75,000
Repayment timeframe asked for
5 years
Long-term vision
5 stores at $40,000/month each = $2.4M annual run rate
The deal
Capital deployed
$150,000 term loan
Interest rate
12% effective annual
Repayment term
5 years
Total interest cost
$92,500 over the life of the loan
Total payback
$242,500
Founder commitment
At least one founder commits to going full-time
Equity given up
0%
Personal guarantee
None
Outcome
Closed on camera
A bootstrapped sustainable general store with 50% margins on goods and a high-frequency refill bar.
General goods (gifts, household items, candles)
70%
$28,000/mo
Refill bar (lotion, soap, shampoo)
15%
$6,000/mo
Snacks
15%
$6,000/mo
Most consigned brands split 50/50 with the store. Snacks run lower margins; the refill bar is the highest.
Product | Sell price | Store keeps | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
Local jewelry (Year 901, etc.) | $69 | $34.50 | 50% |
Snacks (Rotten and similar) | $5 | $1.75 | 30–35% |
Who Gives a Crap toilet paper | $3 | Standard retail margin | Standard |
Refill bar lotion | $1.30/oz | Charged by weight | High |
2017
Founders inspired by Utility store in the UK
Travel trip plants the idea of a curated daily-needs general store
2022
Parker and Scott opens
$40,000 personal savings funds initial inventory · 5-year lease at $3,700/month
2022
First $10,000 in sales
Hit in 30 days · candles emerge as a top-3 category
2022–25
Self-funded growth
$95,000 first-year revenue grew to $40,000/month — entirely from founder savings and reinvested margin
2026
Founderpath term loan
$150,000 at 12% / 5-year term to open stores 2 and 3
Every deal term answers a real-world question. Here’s the logic behind a $150,000 term loan at 12% over 5 years for two new retail locations.
Retail revenue is more predictable than seasonal hospitality. A fixed-rate, fixed-term loan gives Ian and Jess clarity on monthly debt service and lets them plan store-level economics three years out. They asked for debt. Founderpath structured the cleanest debt deal that fit.
Twelve percent annualized is meaningfully cheaper than typical small-business merchant cash advances (which clock at 30–40% effective). Five years matches the realistic ramp window for a new retail location to reach $40,000/month — the metric Parker and Scott already proved at the first store.
Both Ian and Jess were part-time at signing. Capital plus part-time founders is the riskiest combination in small-business lending. Nathan made the deal contingent on at least one founder committing to full-time — protecting the capital and aligning founder incentive with the lender.
Sustainable retail is a steady-growth, low-multiple business. An equity round at a $1–2M valuation would have given an investor 7–15% of the company forever — costing $200,000+ in long-term enterprise value for a $150,000 check. A 12% debt deal costs $92,500 total and ends in 5 years.
This is a Term Loan: fixed annual interest rate (12%), fixed monthly payments, fixed maturity (5 years). It is designed for operators with stable revenue who are funding multi-location expansion and want predictable debt service over a longer ramp window.
Founderpath term loans for second-location buildouts →Founderpath funds brick and mortar operators with non-dilutive capital from $50K to $5M — including term loans for second-location buildouts at single-digit-to-low-double-digit interest rates. Here’s the bar we underwrite against.
Annual revenue
$250,000+ (Parker and Scott runs $480,000)
Operating history
12+ months at the existing location
Repeatable model
A concept already proven at one site you can clone to another
Use of funds
Specific and time-bound: opening additional locations
Founder commitment
At least one founder going full-time once funded
Equity given up
Zero. Always.
What the Parker and Scott deal teaches every brick-and-mortar founder thinking about second-location capital.
Ian and Jess built Parker and Scott to $40,000 per month while both worked full-time elsewhere. That is impressive. It is also why Nathan made the deal contingent on at least one founder going full-time — capital plus part-time founders is the riskiest combination in small-business lending.
Parker and Scott hit their first $10,000 in 30 days. That early signal is what underwrites the lender’s confidence in cloning the model. If your first 30 days do $10,000, your first 12 months can do $100,000+ — and your second location can ramp 4x faster than your first did.
15% of revenue from refilling lotion, soap, and shampoo means customers come back weekly. The store is not competing with Target on convenience — it is competing on values, sustainability, and a relationship. That is a moat against big-box retail.
Ian and Jess want 5 stores at $40,000 each = $200,000 combined monthly = $2.4M annual run rate. Cloning the proven model is the cheapest growth available. The capital question is just: can $150,000 fund the next 2 of those stores? At $75,000 per buildout, yes — exactly.
Selling 10% equity at a $1.5M valuation = $150,000. But that 10% equity costs the founders forever, and at retail multiples (1–2x revenue), they would be selling 10% of $480,000 of revenue for $150,000 — terrible math. A 12% debt deal at $92,500 of interest over 5 years is dramatically cheaper.
The Parker and Scott deal, explained.
A $150,000 term loan at a 12% effective annual interest rate, repaid over 5 years. The capital funds the buildout of two additional retail locations (the second and third Parker and Scott stores). No equity, no personal guarantee.
Roughly $92,500 in interest over the life of the loan — meaning Parker and Scott pays back about $242,500 total on $150,000 of principal. That is significantly cheaper than typical merchant cash advance terms, which run 30–40% effective APR.
Retail is more revenue-stable than seasonal hospitality. A fixed monthly payment lets Ian and Jess plan store-level economics with certainty, and a 5-year term matches the realistic ramp window for opening a brand-new retail location. They asked for debt; Founderpath gave them the cleanest debt structure.
No. The deal is fully non-dilutive — no equity stake, no warrants, no board seats, no covenants beyond the full-time commitment.
Both founders were part-time at signing — running Parker and Scott as a side hustle while working other jobs. Capital plus part-time founders is the riskiest combination in small-business lending. Making at least one full-time commitment was Nathan’s condition for writing the check.
Yes, with the right shape: $250,000+ annual revenue, 12+ months operating history, a repeatable model proven at one location, and a specific plan to open additional locations. Parker and Scott fit each criterion.
For a steady-growth retail business, a term loan wins. Equity at a $1–2M valuation costs 7–15% of the company forever — $200,000+ in long-term enterprise value for a $150,000 check. MCAs run 30–40% effective APR. A 12% term loan over 5 years is dramatically cheaper than either.
This is a Term Loan: fixed interest rate, fixed monthly payments, fixed maturity. Founderpath also offers Merchant Cash Advance (revenue-share repayment) for hospitality and seasonal operators, and revenue financing for SaaS founders.
Every word from the conversation between Nathan, Ian, and Jess, with timestamps.