The Deal · Episode

Parker and Scott: $150K to Open Two New Sustainable General Stores

Ian and Jess built Parker and Scott from $40,000 of personal savings to $40,000 per month in revenue at one Austin location. On camera, Founderpath funded $150,000 at a 12% effective interest rate over 5 years to open their second and third stores.

$40K/mo

Current Revenue

50%

Margins on Goods

15%

Revenue from Refill Bar

$40K

Founders Initial Self-Funding

Deal Snapshot

The full picture: who Ian and Jess are, what they run, what they asked for, and what Founderpath funded.

The business

Business

Parker and Scott (general store)

Founders

Ian and Jess (named after their two oldest sons)

Location

Austin, Texas (strip mall)

Storefront opened

3 years before recording

Category

Brick-and-mortar · Sustainable general store + refill bar

First $10,000 in sales

30 days after opening

First-year revenue

$95,000

Current monthly revenue

$40,000 ($480,000 annualized)

Refill bar share of revenue

15% ($6,000/month)

Margin on general goods

50% (50/50 split with consigned brands)

Margin on snacks

30–35%

Monthly lease

$3,700 (5-year lease, both founders signed)

Initial inventory

$40,000 of personal savings

Founder employment

Both still part-time at recording

The ask

Capital ask

$150,000

Use of funds

Open second and third Parker and Scott stores

Cost per new location

$75,000

Repayment timeframe asked for

5 years

Long-term vision

5 stores at $40,000/month each = $2.4M annual run rate

The deal

Capital deployed

$150,000 term loan

Interest rate

12% effective annual

Repayment term

5 years

Total interest cost

$92,500 over the life of the loan

Total payback

$242,500

Founder commitment

At least one founder commits to going full-time

Equity given up

0%

Personal guarantee

None

Outcome

Closed on camera

The Numbers

A bootstrapped sustainable general store with 50% margins on goods and a high-frequency refill bar.

Revenue mix (monthly)

General goods (gifts, household items, candles)

70%

$28,000/mo

Refill bar (lotion, soap, shampoo)

15%

$6,000/mo

Snacks

15%

$6,000/mo

Product-level economics

Most consigned brands split 50/50 with the store. Snacks run lower margins; the refill bar is the highest.

Product

Sell price

Store keeps

Margin

Local jewelry (Year 901, etc.)

$69

$34.50

50%

Snacks (Rotten and similar)

$5

$1.75

30–35%

Who Gives a Crap toilet paper

$3

Standard retail margin

Standard

Refill bar lotion

$1.30/oz

Charged by weight

High

Capital history

  1. 2017

    Founders inspired by Utility store in the UK

    Travel trip plants the idea of a curated daily-needs general store

  2. 2022

    Parker and Scott opens

    $40,000 personal savings funds initial inventory · 5-year lease at $3,700/month

  3. 2022

    First $10,000 in sales

    Hit in 30 days · candles emerge as a top-3 category

  4. 2022–25

    Self-funded growth

    $95,000 first-year revenue grew to $40,000/month — entirely from founder savings and reinvested margin

  5. 2026

    Founderpath term loan

    $150,000 at 12% / 5-year term to open stores 2 and 3

How Nathan Structured the Deal

Every deal term answers a real-world question. Here’s the logic behind a $150,000 term loan at 12% over 5 years for two new retail locations.

Why a term loan, not a merchant cash advance

Retail revenue is more predictable than seasonal hospitality. A fixed-rate, fixed-term loan gives Ian and Jess clarity on monthly debt service and lets them plan store-level economics three years out. They asked for debt. Founderpath structured the cleanest debt deal that fit.

Why 12% over 5 years

Twelve percent annualized is meaningfully cheaper than typical small-business merchant cash advances (which clock at 30–40% effective). Five years matches the realistic ramp window for a new retail location to reach $40,000/month — the metric Parker and Scott already proved at the first store.

Why the deal required going full-time

Both Ian and Jess were part-time at signing. Capital plus part-time founders is the riskiest combination in small-business lending. Nathan made the deal contingent on at least one founder committing to full-time — protecting the capital and aligning founder incentive with the lender.

Why a debt deal beats equity for this business

Sustainable retail is a steady-growth, low-multiple business. An equity round at a $1–2M valuation would have given an investor 7–15% of the company forever — costing $200,000+ in long-term enterprise value for a $150,000 check. A 12% debt deal costs $92,500 total and ends in 5 years.

The Founderpath product behind this deal

This is a Term Loan: fixed annual interest rate (12%), fixed monthly payments, fixed maturity (5 years). It is designed for operators with stable revenue who are funding multi-location expansion and want predictable debt service over a longer ramp window.

Founderpath term loans for second-location buildouts →
For operators

Could You Get a Deal Like This?

Founderpath funds brick and mortar operators with non-dilutive capital from $50K to $5M — including term loans for second-location buildouts at single-digit-to-low-double-digit interest rates. Here’s the bar we underwrite against.

  • Annual revenue

    $250,000+ (Parker and Scott runs $480,000)

  • Operating history

    12+ months at the existing location

  • Repeatable model

    A concept already proven at one site you can clone to another

  • Use of funds

    Specific and time-bound: opening additional locations

  • Founder commitment

    At least one founder going full-time once funded

  • Equity given up

    Zero. Always.

5 Lessons for Operators

What the Parker and Scott deal teaches every brick-and-mortar founder thinking about second-location capital.

  1. 01

    A side hustle becomes a real business when the founders go full-time

    Ian and Jess built Parker and Scott to $40,000 per month while both worked full-time elsewhere. That is impressive. It is also why Nathan made the deal contingent on at least one founder going full-time — capital plus part-time founders is the riskiest combination in small-business lending.

  2. 02

    First $10,000 in sales is a leading indicator

    Parker and Scott hit their first $10,000 in 30 days. That early signal is what underwrites the lender’s confidence in cloning the model. If your first 30 days do $10,000, your first 12 months can do $100,000+ — and your second location can ramp 4x faster than your first did.

  3. 03

    A refill bar is a high-frequency repeat purchase

    15% of revenue from refilling lotion, soap, and shampoo means customers come back weekly. The store is not competing with Target on convenience — it is competing on values, sustainability, and a relationship. That is a moat against big-box retail.

  4. 04

    A 5-store goal turns a $40K/month business into a $200K/month business

    Ian and Jess want 5 stores at $40,000 each = $200,000 combined monthly = $2.4M annual run rate. Cloning the proven model is the cheapest growth available. The capital question is just: can $150,000 fund the next 2 of those stores? At $75,000 per buildout, yes — exactly.

  5. 05

    Founders + equity + retail = bad math

    Selling 10% equity at a $1.5M valuation = $150,000. But that 10% equity costs the founders forever, and at retail multiples (1–2x revenue), they would be selling 10% of $480,000 of revenue for $150,000 — terrible math. A 12% debt deal at $92,500 of interest over 5 years is dramatically cheaper.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Parker and Scott deal, explained.

A $150,000 term loan at a 12% effective annual interest rate, repaid over 5 years. The capital funds the buildout of two additional retail locations (the second and third Parker and Scott stores). No equity, no personal guarantee.

Roughly $92,500 in interest over the life of the loan — meaning Parker and Scott pays back about $242,500 total on $150,000 of principal. That is significantly cheaper than typical merchant cash advance terms, which run 30–40% effective APR.

Retail is more revenue-stable than seasonal hospitality. A fixed monthly payment lets Ian and Jess plan store-level economics with certainty, and a 5-year term matches the realistic ramp window for opening a brand-new retail location. They asked for debt; Founderpath gave them the cleanest debt structure.

No. The deal is fully non-dilutive — no equity stake, no warrants, no board seats, no covenants beyond the full-time commitment.

Both founders were part-time at signing — running Parker and Scott as a side hustle while working other jobs. Capital plus part-time founders is the riskiest combination in small-business lending. Making at least one full-time commitment was Nathan’s condition for writing the check.

Yes, with the right shape: $250,000+ annual revenue, 12+ months operating history, a repeatable model proven at one location, and a specific plan to open additional locations. Parker and Scott fit each criterion.

For a steady-growth retail business, a term loan wins. Equity at a $1–2M valuation costs 7–15% of the company forever — $200,000+ in long-term enterprise value for a $150,000 check. MCAs run 30–40% effective APR. A 12% term loan over 5 years is dramatically cheaper than either.

This is a Term Loan: fixed interest rate, fixed monthly payments, fixed maturity. Founderpath also offers Merchant Cash Advance (revenue-share repayment) for hospitality and seasonal operators, and revenue financing for SaaS founders.

Full Episode Transcript

Every word from the conversation between Nathan, Ian, and Jess, with timestamps.

(00:00) Nathan: People say the general store is dead, but Parker and Scott is betting it’s not, and they’re betting big on sustainability. How long did it take you to make your first $10,000 in total sales? Ian/Jess: 30 days. Nathan: You did it in 30 days. Can you share first-year sales? Ian/Jess: It was something just around like 95. Nathan: My question is, is the business sustainable? Does this thing make money? Ian/Jess: Last month was 40. Nathan: You guys are doing 40,000 bucks a month in revenue. I want to make you guys an offer. $150,000 at an effective interest rate of 12%. (00:24) Nathan: If we haven’t met, I’m Nathan Latka at Founderpath. Over the past 3 years, I’ve invested $200 million in 500 software companies just sitting behind my computer. Today, that all changes. I’m hitting the streets looking for small business owners that have a big idea. If their idea plus my capital could equal big returns, we’ll do a deal right on the spot. Let’s see if we can make something happen. (01:02) Nathan: So, super cool setup, but as you guys know, strip malls are just getting crushed right now. You can see some of the signage back here. They’re just ripped out. But Parker and Scott is still doing well. Again, betting big on sustainability. The question is, is sustainable retail — saving plastics — an actual sustainable business model? Let’s go in and find out. (01:21) Nathan: All right, so here we are. Hey guys, I’m Nathan. How are you? Ian: How’s it going? Ian. Nathan: Ian, nice to meet you. Jess: Jess. Nathan: Really good to meet you guys. When did you launch this business? Ian: It’ll be three years at the end of this month. Jess: In 2017, we took a trip together to the UK and stepped into this beautiful store called Utility. It was this chaotic but organized mess of a ton of utilitarian goods. We were like, “Okay, this is it, but how do we build on it and make it our own?” We knew we wanted to be a space where people could come regularly and pick up toilet paper or a special gift. Nathan: Show me where they would do that. Where would they grab toilet paper? Jess: That was sort of our goal — to build a space that wasn’t just a gift shop. Certainly there are things in here that can be considered gifts, but also your daily needs — toilet paper, tissues, paper towels. (02:11) Nathan: Like on this thing of toilet paper here. What do you sell this for? Jess: $3, which is more than you’re going to pay at a big-box retailer. But you know that from beginning to end, this is made from recycled goods. There’s no plastic in the process. I think that’s an important piece of the store: it reflects not just products that we like, but products we use, right? Ian: These are the things we use in our home. (02:27) Nathan: Can I ask when you opened the store? Obviously, you can’t open with an empty store. There’s a lot of shelf space here. What did you spend on day one to fill it up? Ian: Roughly 40K. Nathan: Was 40K sort of nothing for you guys? Was this all your life savings? Jess: It was a lot. It was our savings. Ian: We’ve got three kids — one college-age now, one college-age in three years. We got things to think about. So this was an investment, but we believed in it. We knew that if we didn’t do it now, when were we going to do it? So we were taking the plunge. Nathan: So Parker, Scott — those are your boys? Ian: Yes. Nathan: Is the third one going to feel left out? Jess: Third one has a star. She’ll eventually get something maybe down the road. The name was decided before she was. That was the first thing we decided. (03:20) Nathan: This is obviously, if this door doesn’t open on launch day or the day after, you’re going “I just spent $40,000 on inventory.” What’s the lease? Are you comfortable sharing what you pay per month? Ian: We pay just about $3,700 a month. Nathan: And how many months or years were you committing to? Ian: Five. Nathan: Who signed that paperwork? Jess: Both of us. Ian: We went in with our fingers and toes crossed and knew we were hoping to build something. Jess: A lot of faith. And then people just came on day one. We started building out our Instagram presence and things maybe 6 months before. Nathan: How do you post in a way that gets attention to actually drive people right through this exact door to purchase? Jess: We do a lot. We do it all ourselves. We obviously create content constantly — about the store, about our own journeys, about the brands and the folks behind the brand. (03:52) Ben (vendor): I’m Ben. I’m a jeweler and metalsmith here in Austin. My work is also here. It’s called Year 901. Jess: This is her jewelry. Year 901. Nathan: Those are her booby earrings. Jess: I love that she calls them her booby earrings. Nathan: So can you walk me through the economics on these? This would be a $69 sale. What does Ben make? What do you keep? Jess: About half. So it’s 50/50 pretty much. With the exception of snacks. Snacks are a lower margin. Nathan: So it’s fair to say anything I’m seeing here that is not edible, you’re making somewhere around a 50% margin. Jess: Yep. Nathan: What’s your most popular snack? Jess: This is a really fun brand, Rotten. Fun branding, fun name. Nathan: And what would this sell for? Jess: This one is five bucks. Nathan: And what does the margin look like on that for you versus the brand? Jess: Snacks are typically more around 30 to 35%. Nathan: So they retail for $5 top line, you keep about 35% (about $1.50), and the other $3.50 goes to Rotten or the brand. (04:59) Nathan: How long did it take you to make your first $10,000 in total sales? Jess: 30 days. Nathan: You did it in 30 days. What surprised you about the 10,000? Jess: We sold a lot of candles, and we were like, man, where are the candles? Nathan: Did you almost pivot to a candle store? Jess: We were like, should we be a candle store? Candles are still our number-three category in the shop. We partner with a local Austin candle maker, Gemma — actually one of our first candle brands in the shop. We’ve worked with him to create our scents each year. Nathan: Can you share first-year sales? Jess: At the top of my head, it was something just around like 95, and I felt really good about that. Ian: Yes, we were. Nathan: So was that faster than or slower than your expectations? Jess: I don’t know that we had a ton of expectations for the first 6 months. We were just feeling it out. (05:39) Nathan: When did the refill bar get added? Jess: Right away from the beginning. We noticed this uptick in refill bars opening across the U.S. and we loved the idea. So we have laundry soap, lotion, hand and body wash, shampoo, conditioner, surface cleaner. Nathan: I’m trying to see how you bill for this. So you’re charging $1.30 per ounce of lotion. People bring in random bottles, right? Jess: We weigh it first. Nathan: If we go back to last month total sales at the entire shop, how much did this refill bar make percentage-wise? Jess: 15% maybe. Nathan: Oh, that’s pretty big. So 15% of total last month sales came from this sort of square footage in the bar. Are you comfortable sharing the actual number? What does 15% represent? Jess: 15% of last month was 40 — 40,000. Nathan: You guys are doing 40,000 bucks a month in revenue. Guys, I’m actually pretty surprised. I would not have thought that a general store, which many people consider dead, in a strip mall, where you’re selling a combination of aroma therapy, snacks, and refill bars, is doing that kind of revenue. Are you guys paying yourselves? Jess: We’re not yet. Ian: Jess and I both work full-time. This is our side hustle. (06:49) Nathan: What would it take for you guys to quit your full-time jobs and go all in on this? Jess: Five stores. Nathan: You need five stores. Why is five stores the number? In your head, I imagine you’ve come up with a number and you reverse-engineer. Ian: Her number is probably lower than that. Nathan: What’s your number? Ian: Three stores. I think we would need to hit a million of total combined revenue across all stores. Nathan: So $83,333 per month across the combined stores. Why do you think you would need five stores when this one is doing 40? Jess: I just want to feel comfortable. This guy likes a buffer. (07:35) Nathan: If you guys had extra capital, how would you use it? Do you have a second location already staked out? Ian: We actually have an outpost currently. It’s a store within a store. It lets us dip our toe into it without taking on all of the cost. We’ve got a 10-foot-tall structure built inside and then some wall shelves as well and a table or two. Nathan: What is the dream 10 years from now? What does Parker and Scott look like? Ian: I think it’s multiple locations. Nathan: If you could wave a magic wand, what’s the right amount of capital for the next year or two to expand? Jess: I think over the next year, we would love to open another two stores. It was easy to do the first one on that 40K. That wasn’t easy — it was all your own money. 40K of your own money. Scrappy. It was a scrappier approach. I think we have to take a bit more of a refined approach on the next two. So the cost would be a bit higher. Probably around 75 a store. Nathan: 75 per store. So 150K total. (08:23) Nathan: Is there some way that I can put in capital where my capital plus their ideas can lead to 3x growth quickly? Is the equity in something like this valuable? Because when I think about getting equity in something, you would have to have a vision where you’re going to grow it really big and then exit it. That’s the only time I get paid and you guys would get paid. Would you ever actually sell this to somebody? Ian: I don’t know that that’s the vision for us. Our goal, our life goal, is largely to be a part of this for a long time. Nathan: If I offered you a deal that was a debt deal, how much time would the second and third locations need to generate enough free cash flow to start paying down the debt? Ian: We don’t have the benefit of just the two of us working in the store and having no payroll. They’re going to be payroll from day one. It would take a few years for sure. Nathan: What’s a few years? 5 years, 10 years? Ian: Three to five. I’m going to say five. (09:24) Nathan: Is this model repeatable? Can you launch a new store, grow from 10 grand a month to 40 grand a month in 3 years? Ian: I think we can. Nathan: When I make offers like this, I’m invested in a lot of companies. I like to go deep and get involved, but I really can’t be the charging force. I’m a bit concerned that you guys aren’t full-time. Ian: I think we know how to do it. And I think we can make it feel like we are there even. Nathan: That’s a big statement because you’re effectively saying you can replace yourself. Ian: It’s about hiring, right? We hire slow, we hire right. (09:55) Nathan: So with your guys’ permission, I’m just going to step outside, talk to my audience, think for maybe 2, 3, 4 minutes. Let’s see what happens here. What do you think? Cool business, huh? I’m willing to write a check right now on the spot, but my concern is they’re not full-time. I do not like putting money behind founders and entrepreneurs that are not full-time. But I also understand they’ve got three kids. They asked for $150,000 to open up two new locations. This current location does $40,000 a month. What should I offer as a return? Should I do a debt deal here? $150,000 in, they pay me back some amount of interest. Do I do $150,000 and ask for equity? What do you guys think I should do? (10:37) Nathan: What I want to do is, I want to make you guys an offer. So there’s $150,000 paid back over 5 years at an effective interest rate of 12%. So what that means is — and that’s an annual percentage rate. So $150,000 bucks. Let’s make the math easy. That’s basically $17,500 per year in interest, multiplied by 5 years, is about $92,500ish in total interest over the 5-year period. (11:07) Nathan: The question to you guys is, do you think that second and third location could generate that free cash flow to make those payments? Because my offer, if it is debt, remember, I’m not getting any equity upside. Ian: I think it’s feasible for sure. Just given the growth rate that we experienced here. Nathan: And if my money is going in the business, I want you guys fighting for it just as hard as I fought to make it. If we did do a deal, one of you or both of you committing to go full-time can figure it out. Jess: This is our family. Our boys’ names are on the door. This is home for us. We call this our fourth baby. Nathan: Are you writing a check and disappearing and we’re not going to see you for 5 years? Are you going to show up frequently? Ian: Where could you use the most help? Jess: There’s an audience that just keeps needing to be built. We’re competing against Target. We’re competing against Walgreens. So reach is really, I think, the biggest thing. Nathan: Audience, but we’re doing this on YouTube and X and social, right? There are local businesses that you can get behind that can grow as fast or faster than software companies. You guys have great branding, so I’m excited to help contribute to that. (12:07) Nathan: Do you guys want to look at the $150,000 offer at a 12% interest rate paid back over 5 years for the purpose of opening a second and third location, as long as you’re willing to commit to spending more time on the business? What do you want to do? Ian: Let’s go for it. Nathan: You like the idea? Jess: Yeah. Nathan: All right, Ian, Jess, I can’t wait to work with you guys. It’s going to be a lot of fun. (12:40) Nathan: I always get asked, did you really wire the money? Here’s what happens after we’re done shooting. I work with the founders to set up an account on my platform called Founderpath.com. Ian and Jess click the capital raiser card. They connect their data via APIs — in this case, it was QuickBooks. I verify their data, and then my AI agent, which I’ve trained, writes a full memo on the business, recommending how much capital we should invest and on what terms. If Ian and Jess like the deal, you can see they type yes. They connect their bank account and tell us where to wire the money. We wire the money and they go back to running their business. It’s that simple.